<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paper Maps Being Phased Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gislounge.com/paper-maps-being-phased-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gislounge.com/paper-maps-being-phased-out/</link>
	<description>Information about GIS, GPS, cartography and geography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://gislounge.com/paper-maps-being-phased-out/comment-page-1/#comment-5386</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gislounge.com/?p=792#comment-5386</guid>
		<description>Great post Caitlin!  I have to take issue with the comments by Curtis Carroll in regard to the demise of detailed maps - is he not aware of highly detailed street atlases available for many cities, such as those produced by Thomas Bros.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Caitlin!  I have to take issue with the comments by Curtis Carroll in regard to the demise of detailed maps &#8211; is he not aware of highly detailed street atlases available for many cities, such as those produced by Thomas Bros.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
