<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: As Dynamic as Paper Maps Get</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gislounge.com/as-dynamic-as-paper-maps-get/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gislounge.com/as-dynamic-as-paper-maps-get/</link>
	<description>Information about GIS, GPS, cartography and geography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:12:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tina Marshall</title>
		<link>http://gislounge.com/as-dynamic-as-paper-maps-get/comment-page-1/#comment-6456</link>
		<dc:creator>Tina Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gislounge.com/?p=1024#comment-6456</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really see the effectiveness of this map, but I can understand why they&#039;re attempting to market them.  I guess somebody&#039;s got to come up with a new and innovative way to draw people away from just using mapquest or googlemaps.

I found a great post on Peterman&#039;s Eye that talks about the use of paper maps in a technological world.  Great read.  SO I will share...

http://www.petermanseye.com/passions/travel/323-on-the-map

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really see the effectiveness of this map, but I can understand why they&#8217;re attempting to market them.  I guess somebody&#8217;s got to come up with a new and innovative way to draw people away from just using mapquest or googlemaps.</p>
<p>I found a great post on Peterman&#8217;s Eye that talks about the use of paper maps in a technological world.  Great read.  SO I will share&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.petermanseye.com/passions/travel/323-on-the-map" rel="nofollow">http://www.petermanseye.com/passions/travel/323-on-the-map</a></p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morten</title>
		<link>http://gislounge.com/as-dynamic-as-paper-maps-get/comment-page-1/#comment-5879</link>
		<dc:creator>Morten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gislounge.com/?p=1024#comment-5879</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it. I could just as easily put all 3 maps together on one map without the annoying tilt - it would be cheaper and lighter too. The neighbourhood and subway map has so little information anyways that it wouldn&#039;t make the map congested with information. Why not use an aerial map instead as an option? It often helps understanding the area a little better, but that often has too much information to blend with everything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it. I could just as easily put all 3 maps together on one map without the annoying tilt &#8211; it would be cheaper and lighter too. The neighbourhood and subway map has so little information anyways that it wouldn&#8217;t make the map congested with information. Why not use an aerial map instead as an option? It often helps understanding the area a little better, but that often has too much information to blend with everything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
